Tuesday, November 17, 2009

The False Seductions of Wafa Sultan

It’s one of those forwarded e-mails that propagates at the speed of gossip on crack: “You gotta see this.” “Impressive.” “What do you make of her?” The link takes you to the video of a woman saying things about Islam, on al Jazeera, as you’d never expect to hear them on the Qatar-based satellite channel.
Throwing Flames on the "Clash of Civilizations"
She speaks in a voice as impassioned and rhythmic as Malcolm X’s at his best: “The clash we are witnessing around the world is not a clash of religions, or a clash of civilizations. It is a clash between two opposites, between two eras,” the woman says. “It is a clash between a mentality that belongs to the Middle Ages and another mentality that belongs to the 21st century. It is a clash between civilization and backwardness, between the civilized and the primitive, between barbarity and rationality. It is a clash between freedom and oppression, between democracy and dictatorship....”
The woman is Wafa Sultan. Until her 15 minutes of flaming Islam on Feb. 21, she was an unheard-of psychiatrist living in a Los Angeles suburb, a 47-year-old Syrian expatriate who, as a medical student at a Syrian university in 1979, watched as Muslim Brotherhood gunmen barged into her classroom and shot her professor: “They shot hundreds of bullets into him shouting ‘God is Great,’” she told The New York Times. “At that point, I lost my trust in their god and began to question all our teachings. It was the turning point of my life, and it has led me to this present point. I had to leave. I had to look for another god.”
Religion as Unreason
Some of us Catholics, as I’m sure some of us Protestants, Jews and Shintoists, have had the same reaction, with or without the unhappy benefit of watching fanaticism in action before our eyes. Baptism by blood or fire isn’t the only prerequisites for a conversion to reason. History’s morgues are rich enough to supply unending evidence that every religion at one point or another — the Torah’s many Koran-like commandments to commit unspeakable acts against one’s children or against women and children in enemy cities among them — has produced its armies of madmen scorching earth in gods’ names.
So Wafa Sultan wasn’t onto something original in her Feb. 21 segment on al-Jazeera. She was just applying it to Islam, which happens to be the religion currently boasting the greater proportion of theocrats, tyrants and armies-of-one bomb squads.
Wafa Sultan, American Idol
That didn’t stop her from becoming America’s idol, especially among conservatives and evangelicals looking to the West as good and Islam as evil. (Her al-Jazeera clip was downloaded 1 million times by March 2006.)
They quote Wafa Sultan’s attractive, if historically gimpy, phrases: “We have not seen a single Jew blow himself up in a German restaurant. We have not seen a single Jew destroy a church. We have not seen a single Jew protest by killing people. The Muslims have turned three Buddha statues into rubble. We have not seen a single Buddhist burn down a Mosque, kill a Muslim, or burn down an embassy.”
All Religions Have Their Terrorists
Not to start playing that silly game of comparative terrors, but Sultan must’ve not checked the latest State Department designations of terrorist organizations. It includes Israel’s Kahane Chai, whose members have murdered Arab civilians, including in mosques. Sultan must’ve also missed news of the ethnic war between the Buddhist-Sinhalese majority and the Hindi Tamil minority in Sri Lanka, where more than 60,000 people have been killed since the mid-1980s.
To put it more bluntly--as Martin Amis does in "The Second Plane" (Knopf, 2008)--"All religions, unsurprisingly, have their terrorists: Christian, Jewish, Hindu, even Buddhist. But we're not hearing from those religions. We are hearing from Islam."
"Islam's Ann Coulter"
The more serious problem with Sultan, however, is how she has taken her fame — based on some necessary observations about present-day Islam — and turned it into a sword that sees Islam and the Koran as exclusively evil, backward, repressive. “In a world far too often dominated by politicians imbued with religious fundamentalism of all flavors — Jewish, Christian, Muslim — we need the thoughtfulness, self-awareness and subtlety that comes from progressive religious expression,” Rabbi Stephen Julius Stein wrote in the Los Angeles Times after attending a fund-raiser for Israel and hearing Sultan, a guest speaker, score applause by bashing Islam as if she were Pat Robertson in drag (Robertson considers Islam “violent at its core.”
“We have that in Judaism, in Christianity — and in Islam, right in our backyard,” Stein wrote. “If only Sultan, applauded in many quarters yet miscast as a voice of reason and reform in Islam, were paying attention.” Stein’s piece was entitled “Islam’s Ann Coulter.”
That about sums up Wafa Sultan if she chooses to inflame the belligerence of America’s Islam-bashers rather than enlighten their glass houses’ dim blurbs — and her own.



Get "Them" The Hell Out of Here!

Denmark to pay immigrants £12,000 to go home if they 'can't or won't' assimilate.
is boosting cash incentives to entice immigrants to return to their homelands if they 'can't or won't' assimilate into society.
The offer now on the table is close to £12,000 for every person who takes up the offer to leave.
Critics of the measure say it sends the wrong message to foreigners but the centre-right government in is forging ahead with the plan.
The financial carrot is ten times more than that previously offered under a scheme which as been law since 1997.
'We thought it was important to substantially increase this aid so that immigrants who want to return home because they are not able to adapt to Danish society have a strong financial basis to start a new life,' said foreign affairs spokesman Soeren Espersen of the far-right Danish People's Party.
The offer is aimed at immigrants and refugees who 'cannot or do not want to integrate into Danish society,' said the head of the DPP's parliamentary group, Kristian Tuelesen Dahl.
The centre-right minority government reached an agreement on the financial incentive with the far-right DPP as part of its 2010 budget negotiations.
In addition, 20 million kroner will be set aside for city councils in charge of integrating immigrants to 'motivate' foreigners to return to their homelands.
Opposition parties are shocked by the news, and fear it sends the message 'that foreigners are not welcome in Denmark'.
Since 1997, around 2,524 immigrants have voluntarily repatriated to their home countries, according to Denmark's refugee, immigrant and integration ministry.
Most of them were from the former Yugoslavia, , Iran, , Somalia and .
Immigrants account for about 7.3 per cent of Denmark's population of 5.5 million.

Something Rotten in Denmark?by Daniel Pipes and Lars HedegaardNew York PostAugust 27, 2002
A Muslim group in Denmark announced a few days ago that a $30,000 bounty would be paid for the murder of several prominent Danish Jews, a threat that garnered wide international notice. Less well known is that this is just one problem associated with Denmark's approximately 200,000 Muslim immigrants. The key issue is that many of them show little desire to fit into their adopted country.For years, Danes lauded multiculturalism and insisted they had no problem with the Muslim customs - until one day they found that they did. Some major issues:* Living on the dole: Third-world immigrants - most of them Muslims from countries such as Turkey, Somalia, Pakistan, Lebanon and Iraq - constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.* Engaging in crime: Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.* Self-imposed isolation: Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.* Importing unacceptable customs: Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem.Another is threats to kill Muslims who convert out of Islam. One Kurdish convert to Christianity, who went public to explain why she had changed religion, felt the need to hide her face and conceal her identity, fearing for her life.* Fomenting anti-Semitism: Muslim violence threatens Denmark's approximately 6,000 Jews, who increasingly depend on police protection. Jewish parents were told by one school principal that she could not guarantee their children's safety and were advised to attend another institution. Anti-Israel marches have turned into anti-Jewish riots. One organization, Hizb-ut-Tahrir, openly calls on Muslims to "kill all Jews . . . wherever you find them."* Seeking Islamic law: Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.Other Europeans (such as the late Pim Fortuyn in Holland) have also grown alarmed about these issues, but Danes were the first to make them the basis for a change in government.In a momentous election last November, a center-right coalition came to power that - for the first time since 1929 - excluded the socialists. The right broke its 72-year losing streak and won a solid parliamentary majority by promising to handle immigration issues, the electorate's first concern, differently from the socialists.The next nine months did witness some fine-tuning of procedures: Immigrants now must live seven years in Denmark (rather than three) to become permanent residents. Most non-refugees no longer can collect welfare checks immediately on entering the country. No one can bring into the country an intended spouse under the age of 24. And the state prosecutor is considering a ban on Hizb-ut-Tahrir for its death threats against Jews.These minor adjustments prompted howls internationally - with European and U.N. reports condemning Denmark for racism and "Islamophobia," the Washington Post reporting that Muslim immigrants "face habitual discrimination," and a London Guardian headline announcing that "Copenhagen Flirts with Fascism."In reality, however, the new government barely addressed the existing problems. Nor did it prevent new ones, such as the death threats against Jews or a recent Islamic edict calling on Muslims to drive Danes out of the Norrebro quarter of Copenhagen.The authorities remain indulgent. The military mulls permitting Muslim soldiers in Denmark's volunteer International Brigade to opt out of actions they don't agree with - a privilege granted to members of no other faith. Mohammed Omar Bakri, the self-proclaimed London-based "eyes, ears and mouth" of Osama bin Laden, won permission to set up a branch of his organization, Al-Muhajiroun.Contrary to media reports, the real news from Denmark is not flirting with fascism but getting mired in inertia. A government elected specifically to deal with a set of problems has made minimal headway. Its reluctance has potentially profound implications for the West as a whole.

Why we all must continue to republish the Danish Cartoons with no apologies
Update by Lewis Loflin
Muslims are at it again in Denmark. "Danish newspapers republish Prophet cartoon" (Feb 13, 2008) according to Reuters. To quote, "The newspapers said they were republishing the drawing (above) in protest over a plot to murder the cartoonist." These pictures included the Prophet with a bomb in his turban -- drew attacks from Danish Islamists. "A Danish citizen of Moroccan descent and two Tunisians were arrested on Tuesday for planning to murder 73-year-old Kurt Westergaard, a cartoonist at Jyllands-Posten, the Danish paper that originally published the drawings in September 2005."
15 large and small Danish daily newspapers and a Swedish daily reprinted Westergaard's cartoon of Mohammad with a bomb in his turban in order to show freedom of speech is the law in the West, not evil Shari ah fascism. Muslims make up 3% of Denmark. Even the left-leaning Politiken reprinted the cartoon, and "called the murder plot an attack on Denmark's democratic culture." Perhaps the left is getting the message.
But Reuters continues, "Danish Muslim groups criticized the move as divisive, but said it regarded the issue as a local one on this occasion. "We believe this is very foolish and does not help building the bridges we need," said Mostafa Chendid, an imam at the Islamic Faith Community, a religious Muslim organization at the center of the first cartoon controversy. It will make our young people feel more isolated," he told Reuters. "The printing of the cartoon is an insult to our intellectual capacity."
This Islamist group in 2005 helped organize via Saudi Arabia the waves of rioting and murder over the cartoons. "It's the same picture, so it's ... just a republication of what was published before," Chendid said. "In the beginning it was pure provocation to Muslims. It's two different situations." In other words it backfired and they are backing off this time. To quote Reuters, "The group said it had no plans to travel or export this problem abroad." See what standing up to Islamists can accomplish?
The cartoons were also reprinted in French and German papers. This includes Franch Soir and they "said it had published the cartoons to show that "religious dogma" had no place in a secular society...Yes, we have the right to caricature God." They ran a front page cartoon of Buddhist, Jewish, Muslim and Christian gods floating on a cloud. And the paper said it had decided to republish them "because no religious dogma can impose itself on a democratic and secular society...(the cartoons)... has done nothing to maintain balance and mutual limits in democracy, respect of religious beliefs and freedom of expression." Die Welt and the Berliner Zeitung also reprinted some of the cartoons.
In summery we must reject all aspects of Muslim culture and Shari'ah Law that conflicts with individual liberty and western democracy. We must end this pandering to Islam and treat them as adults, holding them responsible for their actions. If Muslims want to live in the west and enjoy the prosperity and freedom that's impossible under their primitive and barbaric cultures, they will conform or get the hell out.
Something Rotten in Denmark
Salute the Danish Flag
Theo van Gogh and "Education By Murder" in Holland
Cartoons and Islamic Imperialism
The Clash to End All Clashes? Making sense of the cartoon jihad
Click here to download all 12 cartoons.
Denmark Is Unlikely Front in Islam-West Culture War
Dane Defends Press Freedom as Muslims Protest Cartoons
More European Papers Print Cartoons of Muhammad, Fueling Dispute With Muslims
Submission is all in your dhimmitude

In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. But in 1978 - even in Copenhagen, one didn't see Muslim immigrants.The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism, one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 - a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time.The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior ed u cational system and a history of humanitarianism. Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies - it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets - all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite? By the 1990's the growing urban Muslim population was obvious - and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark's liberal way of life, the Danes - once so welcoming - began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.The New York Post in 2002 ran an article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported: 'Muslim immigrants constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.' 'Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark's 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country's convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes. ''Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.' 'Forced marriages - promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death - are one problem'. 'Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark's Muslim population grows large enough - a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.' It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and the US: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fe ar f or their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden - before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa - who, as a teenager, had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers - and I wonder what she would say today. In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years - one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal, unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. (Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of 'racism' by liberal media across Europe - even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.) If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark's history, culture and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age and you won't find it so easy any more to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren't. In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying. The government's welfare committee had calculated that, if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. 'We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration.'The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,' he said. A large thorn in the side of Denmark 's imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration. 'The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference' Hvilshoj says. 'There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.' And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, 'In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights and freedom of speech.'Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark , Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family's thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret lo cation and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time - in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce. Her government has slid to the right and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. Meanwhile, Americans clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. We, in America, look at the enclaves of Muslims and Illegal Hispanics amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language or appreciate our history. We would do well to look to Denmark and say a prayer for her future and for our own.



Republican Hottie Palin Goes Rogue - Oh Yeah! I Mean Oy Vey!


Does Sarah Palin Have A Secret Ancestor?
Ancestral Reports Show Her Grandfather Was From Lithuania
Voice of the White House September 12, 2008 TBR News.org – September 12, 2008 “As a Republican, I find myself repelled by the shrill and very vicious campaign ads prepared by the staffs of Senator McCain and Governor Palin. I have never heard such desperate, hysterical lies in my entire political life. Both of them have been mindlessly attacking Senator Obama because they represent a political party that is disgrace with the American public.. Bush is loathed, the economy has tanked and will tank worse, the wars go on without end, the corruption in the present government is out of control and reminds me of some third world country. Both McCain and Palin are part and parcel of the mindsets of the Bush people. They have done everything but call Obama a nigger but if they did, it would not surprise me. Losers always play dirty.
McCain Wanted Lieberman
The inclusion of Sarah Palin on the McCain ticket was a terrible mistake. McCain was bound and determined that Joe Lieberman be his vice president but the leadership of the GOP told him repeatedly and heatedly that if he did that, he automatically would lose the election. Lieberman is viewed as a turncoat and a loud supporter of Israel and in our current political climate, no one cares about a turncoat but they do not like Israel or her loud, demanding and backstabbing supporters. Then he chose Governor Palin, about whom little is known to the electorate.
Palin Was Brought In To Calm Down An Enraged McCain
Put forward as a maverick, she is in truth a catastrophe. She was not vetted by anyone because someone quickly had to be found to satisfy the enraged McCain. Sarah is indeed a walking political disaster.
Will Palin Backfire On The GOP
If the GOP was afraid of Joe Lieberman, they will be terrified of the damage the Devine Sarah can cause. There is much in her background that will most certainly emerge, most especially since she has savagely attacked the American media. Yammering negativity to the media is like punching a state trooper in the nose when he stops you from driving at 90 on the median strip. Problems will certainly follow.
All of the following material is taken from a confidential DoJ report sitting on my desk as I write. The Republican’s unvetted choice was born Sarah Louise Heath on February 11, 1964 at Sandpoint, Idaho. Her father, Charles Heath was a science teacher and her mother, Sally Sheeran Heath was listed as a housewife. Sarah attended a number of schools and finally received a BA in journalism from the University of Idaho. Her current husband, Todd, is a Native American Yup'ik Eskimo and works for BP at one of their Alaskan oil fields and does part-time work as a fisherman. They have five children. Their eldest son, Track, 19, is in the U.S. army and their three daughters, Bristol, 18, Willow, 14 and Piper, 7. In 2008 (April 18, 2008), a son, Trig was born. This child suffers from Mongoloidism. Their second unmarried daughter Willow, is now pregnant.
Palin's Israeli Allegiance
The Palin family lives in Wasilla, about 40 miles north of Anchorage. Aside from a number of thoroughly unpleasant episodes concerning family members, overcharging the state, heavy involvement with corrupt local politicians, attempts to foster her personal religious beliefs (Palin is a very active and aggressive Evangelical) there is the question of family matters she has attempted to conceal to advance her political career. Governor Palin “proudly displays” an Israeli flag in her gubernatorial office and for a very good reason.
Palin's Grandfather
Her maternal grandfather, Schmuel Sheigam, was a Lithuanian Jew, born in 1912 in Vilkaviskis, Lithuania, 91.2 miles west of Vilnius. The Sheigam family immigrated to America, via Hamburg, Germany in 1915 because of WWI.
The Names Are Altered
At Ellis Island Immigration Centre, the name was entered as Sheeran, a standard practice of the time when immigration officers were unable to understand the pronunciation of non-English speaking immigrants. Sheeran is a common Irish name but members of the Sheigam family are buried in the Jewish cemetery at Budezeriai near Vilkaviskis:in Lithuania
Further information on Governor Palin’s ancestors can easily be found in the vital records in the Lithuanian State Historical Archives in Vilnius. The Archives holds birth, marriage, divorce, and death records for the Lithuanian Jewish community from 1851 until 1915 when the Jews were required to leave the country because of World War I. They are in 18th Century Cyrillic script and Yiddish Many of these records include the mother's maiden name and town of registration.
If This Is True, It Answers A Lot Of Questions
Obviously McCain's VP stands a good chance of taking over as president. The Zionist cabal just didn't let this Palin in from nowhere. McCain could have had John Kerry, or Wesley Clarke, Lieberman, but this unknown popped up.
Whoever she is there is no question she was handpicked by Zionists.


Sarah Palin’s Son A Drug User?
The NATIONAL ENQUIRER’S exclusive ongoing investigation of GOP VP Nom Sarah 'Barracuda' Palin’s goes far beyond a mere teen pregnancy crisis this week! The Enquirer’s team of reporters has combed the Alaskan wilderness to discover the hidden truth about Gov. Palin’s family, which has become a central part of her political identity. The ENQUIRER has learned exclusively that Sarah's oldest son, Track, was addicted to the power drug OxyContin for nearly the past two years, snorting it, eating it, smoking it and even injecting it. And as Track, 19, heads to Iraq as part of the U.S. armed forces, Sarah and her husband Todd were powerless to stop his wild antics, detailed in the new issue of The ENQUIRER, which goes on sale today. THE ENQUIRER also has exclusive details about Track's use of other drugs, including cocaine, and his involvement in a notorious local vandalism incident.“I’ve partied with him (Track) for years,” a source disclosed. “I’ve seen him snort cocaine, snort and smoke OxyContin, drink booze and smoke weed.” The source also divulged the girls would do anything for Track and he’d use his local celebrity status to manipulate other guys “to get them to steal things he wanted.” “He finally did what a lot of troubled kids here do,” the source divulged. “You join the military.”And as Gov. Palin has billed the state of Alaska for various expenses related to her children, as reported by The Washington Post, The ENQUIRER's investigation reveals that she was so incensed by 17-year-old Bristol's pregnancy that she banished her daughter from the house.Another family friend revealed pre-prego Bristol was as much of a hard partier as Track was. “Bristol was a huge stoner and drinker. I’ve seen her smoke pot and get drunk and make out with so many guys. All the guys would brag that the just made out with Bristol.” When Sarah found out the teen was pregnant by high schooler Levi Johnston, she was actually banished from the house. As part of the cover-up, Palin quickly transferred Bristol to another high school and made her move in with Sarah’s sister Heather 25 miles away! And the ENQUIRER also learned that Levi Johnston, the baby mamma’s future wedded dada, who was glad handed by John McCain at the GOP Convention, isn’t too happy about his impending shotgun nups either. “Levi got dragged out of the house to go to Minnesota,” Levi’s friend told The ENQUIRER. “Levi realizes he’s stuck being with Bristol because her mom is running for Vice President.” The friend also confided that both Bristol and Levi “broke up a few times and they definitely messed around with other people.” Meanwhile, as members of the Palin family’s war viciously over “Trooper-Gate” and claims of Sarah’s extramarital affair have turned the political race into a chaotic arena of threats, denials and vicious attacks by political black ops, The ENQUIRER has discovered shocking new details about the red-hot affair scandal! For the full story of the secrets Sarah Palin is trying to hide – pick up the new ENQUIRER!

Confirmed Obama lover Oprah is refusing to have GOP VP Nom Sarah Palin on her show.That is - until after the election.Reportedly, the fatty chatty's staff was deeply divided over having Palin on the show - despite the Alaskan Gov's obvious newsworthiness."Half of her staff really wants Sarah Palin on," an insider told The Drudge Report. "Oprah's website is getting tons of requests to put her on, but Oprah and a couple of her top people are adamantly against it because of Obama." As the incendiary controversy ignited the blogosphere, Oprah herself issued a statement:"There has been absolutely no discussion about having Sarah Palin on my show," the Big O said."At the beginning of this Presidential campaign when I decided that I was going to take my first public stance in support of a candidate, I made the decision not to use my show as a platform for any of the candidates."That said Oprah had Sen. Barak Obama on twice before she backed his candidacy. "I agree that Sarah Palin would be a fantastic interview, and I would love to have her on after the campaign is over," Oprah quietly back pedaled.Perhaps Palin can guest on The Rachael Ray Show provided she doesn't bring that recipe-stealing Cindy McCain along!

More on Track:
“Before joining the Army last September Track partied all the time. I saw him do so many keg stands, and all he ever talked about was getting stoned. I’ve smoked weed with Track many times. He was one of two kids that had a fake ID in school - and he got caught buying beer at a local liquor store by a teacher standing behind him in line…’”
“Track was addicted to OxyContin during 2006 and 2007: ”He even told me he tried mainlining OxyContin once in a restaurant bathroom, but he didn’t like the way it made him feel. He was so badly into it, he used it any way he could - smoked, snorted and ate it sometimes…””
More on Bristol:
“When Sarah found out the teen was pregnant by high schooler Levi Johnston, she was actually banished from the house. As part of the cover-up, Palin quickly transferred Bristol to another high school and made her move in with [Palin's] sister Heather 25 miles away!”
More on Levi:
“’Levi got dragged out of the house to go to Minnesota,’ says a friend. ‘Levi realizes he’s stuck being with Bristol because her mom is running for Vice President.’ The friend also confided that both Bristol and Levi ‘broke up a few times and they definitely messed around with other people.’”

Maybe when her book money runs out and she's desperate to score a couple of million she can take this offer up...,
Sarah Palin offered $2 million to appear in porn film

Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has received her first job offer since failing in her bid to become vice president of the United States, and it comes with a large cash offer. Florida-based porn director Cezar Capone has offered to pay Palin $2 million to appear in an adult film production.

By Vancouver Sun November 8, 2008
Alaska Governor Sarah Palin has received her first job offer since failing in her bid to become vice-president of the United States, and it comes with a large cash offer. Florida-based porn director Cezar Capone has offered to pay Palin $2 million to appear in an adult film production.Capone, who calls himself "the king of all MILF films," promises in an open letter on his website that the film would be distributed internationally, shot in high definition, and feature a "beautiful mother recognized by all of America ... as the most desirable woman over 40."To prove he's serious about the offer, Capone says he's prepared to hold the money in escrow immediately.To sweeten the deal, Palin's husband Todd has been offered a co-starring role in the production, for which Capone would be "prepared to kick in an extra $100,000," and a new Arctic Cat snowmobile. Palin hasn't publicly responded to the offer, which was sent to her administration office in Juneau, Alaska on Nov. 6.Capone has previously released such films as Agent Filthy 0069, High Definition and Sophia Revealed, none of which featured any senior members of the U.S. Republican Party. Hustler Magazine recently released a spoof Palin porn video titled Nailin' Paylin, which was referenced in a now-infamous YouTube prank call made by Montreal shock jocks the Masked Avengers in the final days of the U.S. election campaign.

Palin angered by 'sexist' Newsweek cover

Tue Nov 17, 2:41 pm ET
For the second time since Sarah Palin stepped into the national political spotlight, a photo of the former Republican vice-presidential candidate featured on the cover of Newsweek magazine is sparking controversy. Palin herself blasted the "out-of-context" cover as "sexist" on her Facebook page.
Originally published in the August 2009 issue of Runners World, the photo features the former Alaska governor in short runner's shorts. It was part of a multi-photograph slideshow that accompanied an article about Palin and her love for the sport titled, "I'm A Runner." In her Facebook post late last night, Palin took issue with Newsweek using a photo from an article about health and fitness to promote an analysis piece contemplating her relevance as a political figure:
"The choice of photo for the cover of this week's Newsweek is unfortunate. When it comes to Sarah Palin, this "news" magazine has relished focusing on the irrelevant rather than the relevant. The Runner's World magazine one-page profile for which this photo was taken was all about health and fitness -- a subject to which I am devoted and which is critically important to this nation. The out-of-context Newsweek approach is sexist and oh-so-expected by now. If anyone can learn anything from it: it shows why you shouldn't judge a book by its cover, gender, or color of skin. The media will do anything to draw attention -- even if out of context.
The reaction to the Newsweek cover has predictably sparked outrage from conservative supporters of Palin and kudos from liberals who oppose her. CBN commentator David Brady called the cover "a new low" for the "biased" magazine, adding that Newsweek has a history of portraying liberal women as "heroes for the next generation," while portraying conservative women like Palin as "nuts and dopey." Meanwhile, documentary photographer Nina Berman hailed the cover as "brilliant" and "shrewd" for using a "propped photo where Palin is an obvious participant ... to show how far out she is willing to travel on the road of self promotion" while "shield[ing] themselves from what would have been the inevitable criticism if they had dolled her up themselves and posed her the same way."
The current cover flap isn't the first time Newsweek has generated controversy with a photograph of Palin. The October 13, 2008, issue featured an extreme close-up of Palin that seemed to be devoid of the high-tech retouching often employed by magazines. Conservatives claimed this highlighted some of Palin's supposed "flaws," like wrinkles around her eyes.
Newsweek Editor Jon Meacham told Yahoo! News that the photo choice was simply the "most interesting image available":
"We chose the most interesting image available to us to illustrate the theme of the cover, which is what we always try to do. We apply the same test to photographs of any public figure, male or female: does the image convey what we are saying? That is a gender-neutral standard.

In Going Rogue: An American Life Sarah Palin make sthe claim that she does not believe in evolution. She has not been so straightfoward in the past on this topic, according to think progress.
...she talks about creationism, saying she "didn't believe in the theory that human beings -- thinking, loving beings -- originated from fish that sprouted legs and crawled out of the sea" or from "monkeys who eventually swung down from the trees."
This is a flip flop from what she said during the campaign. Sara Palin is a flip flopper. Spread it around.


Monday, November 16, 2009

UFC fighter was eating ketchup and rice before UFC 104

If anyone needed a huge postfight bonus at UFC 104, it was Pat Barry. The heavyweight out of New Orleans, scored Knockout of the Night and Fight of the Night for his victory over Antoni Hardonk. That was good enough for $120,000. Good thing, Barry needed the infusion of cash in the worst way. He confirmed to MMAScrapsRadio that he was completely down on his luck before the fight, agreeing that he had little to eat in Los Angeles the week of the fight.
"I still had my apartment but if something would've happened and the fight had been canceled, I would've been evicted six days later."
Barry, 30, said he didn't even tell his trainer Duke Roufus for fear that he would think the fighter had the wrong motivation going into the fight. Barry said he didn't ask anyone for money including his mother:
"I could ask someone but then at the same time, how hard are you going to work for something if everytime you get in trouble somebody catches you? I did something to put myself in this position I have to work my way out of it."
Barry got his $120,000 bonus check last Tuesday. He couldn't believe it. When he went to deposit the check, his truck wouldn't start. Barry got a jump and hit the bank sporting a black eye and pink striped shorts.
"I go to the bank, I'm sweaty, I've got the black eye, I haven't shaven in two days, I'm strung out because I haven't slept, I have green circles under my eyes so I'm like 'Can I have a deposit slip mam?'. She gives it to me, I fill it out hand it to her. She looks at the deposit slip, then the check, then looks at me and says 'Excuse me I'll be right back.' Then a manager comes out, a guy in a suit and says 'What seems to be the problem?' I was like 'Well I have a black eye, that's the only problem I know this looks really ridiculous.' So he asks me for my ID, I hand him my license an he's like 'Your license says Pat Barry, but this check was written to Patrick Barry.' So I decided to be funny and tell him Pat Barry is in my trunk right now. He didnt laugh. So I told him take your time man do whatever you need to do because I have no where to go and my truck probably wont start when I go outside so you can just do whatever you need to do. An hour later he came back and everything was fine, the check was in my bank account."

Pay problem parents not to breed!- mayor

AN outspoken Kiwi politician has proposed a new solution to the country's child abuse problem - pay the "appalling underclass" not to breed.
Michael Laws - who stirred up controversy by calling the late Tongan King a "bloated brown slug'' - has again hit the headlines.
"That there is a group within our society who give their children no hope nor opportunity from the moment that they are born," the regional mayor wrote on the New Zealand radio website where he broadcasts as a talkback DJ.
"That these ‘parents’ are known to authorities ... and yet the authorities can only intervene after children have been harmed."
Mr Laws goes on to write: "it would be far better for this appalling underclass to be offered financial inducements not to have children, given the toxic environment that they would provide for any child in their care."
The mayor believes "the consequent financial and social savings to our community would be considerable.
"There are too many people who should not have children."
Mr Laws said a report in New Zealand's Dominion-Post newspaper yesterday had incorrectly attributed the view to him that all those who got welfare should be sterilised.
Mr Laws wrote on the website "that most welfare beneficiaries are good parents" but it was the problem ones who should be offered money not to breed.
Yesterday's Dominion-Post newspaper quotes him as saying: "If we gave $10,000 to certain people and said 'we'll voluntarily sterilise you' then all of society would be better off,'' he told the . "There'd be less dead children and less social problems.'' He was commenting on the latest death of a toddler, two-year-old Karl Perigo-Check, who was the son of a convicted murderer and gang member. New Zealand is placed third among OECD nations for child deaths due to maltreatment, four spots ahead of Australia, according to UNICEF. It is ranked fifth for both child beatings and sexual abuse, again several places ahead of its antipodean neighbour. Mr Laws argued that "liberal methods'' of beating the problem had failed. But his "solution'' has been branded "draconian'' and "totalitarian'' by the country's child health advocates who are calling for him to stand down as a city mayor. "I just find it such a disgraceful attitude,'' Child Poverty Action Group director Janfrie Wakim said. "It's hard to comprehend that an intelligent man who's leading a city is making such reprehensible suggestions.'' This is just the latest controversy for Mr Laws, who last month hit headlines for bullying primary school children. The indigenous children had written to the mayor to express annoyance that he refused to make a subtle spelling change to the name of the North Island town, Wanganui, to make it historically correct. But Laws, a fierce critic of the name change, took exception to the letters, replying: "There are so many deficiencies of both fact and logic in your letters that I barely know where to start''. He told them they should sack their teacher for suggesting they write to him.
Radical idea to stop people breeding gets us talking
A RADICAL idea to pay people not to have kids captured the interest of Australian readers this week, making it news.com.au's most popular story.
Michael Laws, a Kiwi politician, said governments should pay the “appalling underclass” not to breed because there were people “within our society who give their children no hope nor opportunity from the moment that they are born”. Just behind Mr Laws’ unorthodox call came the amazing story of an 11-year-old girl giving birth to a "new toy" on her wedding day. The Bulgarian girl, Kordeza Zhelyazkova, went into labour during her wedding to her teenage boyfriend. It was a big day for the young bride, who was still wearing her wedding dress and tiara when she was rushed to hospital, later giving birth to little Violeta. "I'm not going to play with toys any more - I have a new toy now," she said

FURY erupted yesterday after an immigrant baby killer was paid £4,500 to leave Britain.
Agnes Wong, 29, who swung the baby by his ankles and smashed his head was convicted of the manslaughter of 17-month-old Hugo Wang at Manchester Crown Court in January last year. She was jailed for five years but was freed in July after time spent in custody was taken into account.
Two weeks ago, Wong left the UK on a plane from London Heathrow and went back to Malaysia with a “voucher” worth £4,500.
Her victim died of a brain injury in January 2007 inflicted while Wong was looking after him. He also suffered bite marks, bruising and burns caused by a hairdryer.
Details of the payment emerged days after Gordon Brown acknowledged public fears about the cost of immigration. Tory immigration spokesman Damian Green said: “Only last week, Gordon Brown said he ‘gets it’ on immigration, but this is proof he doesn’t get it. For an immigrant who killed a child to get taxpayers’ money to help with her future life is nothing short of appalling.” Mr Green demanded to know why Wong had not been automatically deported without any public money.
And Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the Migrationwatch think-tank, said: “It is absolutely wrong in principle that criminals who thoroughly deserve to be deported should be paid for going.”
And a friend of Hugo’s parents said: “It is an absolute disgrace that she has got this money. It will go a long way in Malaysia.”
Wong was paid through the Government’s assistance scheme for reintegration, which is worth up to £5,000 for serving foreign criminals and £3,000 for time-served.
David Wood, the UK Border Agency’s director of criminality and detention, said: “Ms Wong was returned home under the Facilitated Returns Scheme. We don’t want foreign criminals in the UK.”

The Black Farmers Scam

President Barack Obama has repeatedly vowed to cut wasteful government spending, and his 2010 budged released earlier this month specifically cuts $17 billion from more than 120 programs. One item included in the 2010 budget is $1.250 billion in settlement funds to bring to a closure the long-standing black farmers' lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Agriculture.The black farmers' case began in December 1996, when President Clinton, after observing a handful of black farmers demonstrating in the park across from the White House, told his Agriculture Secretary, Dan Glickman, to "keep those people out of my back yard." The following month, Glickman announced, without any evidence to back up his charges, that racial discrimination was "rampant" in the USDA.This "admission" of racism prompted the class action black farmers' lawsuit Pigford v. Glickman (a.k.a. the Pigford case), which the USDA decided to settle rather than fight. As part of the settlement, the government would pay $50,000 to any African-American who "farmed, or attempted to farm" and who alleged discrimination.No documentation or proof of discrimination was required of claimants, and the judge acknowledged that most claimants "would have recovered nothing if they were required to prove their cases by the traditional preponderance of evidence standard." The settlement was an open invitation to fraud.Indeed, numerous fraud rings were organized all over the country. It's said that most of the residents of one New York City housing project submitted claims. And in one confirmed case, the perpetrators of a fraud ring in Mississippi murdered a woman who was planning to testify against them.The USDA spent $450,000 publicizing the settlement. Advertisements were placed in 100 black-oriented papers, and 44 commercials were run on BET. The advertisements generated 139,000 inquiries, and 111,000 people requested the forms necessary to file a claim.90,000 people eventually filed claims. Since the USDA counts only 18,500 black farmers in the US, the number of people who attempted to collect was more than five times the number of black farmers in the entire country.To date, 13,000 claimants have been paid roughly $1 billion. Over 70,000 of the claims received haven't been paid because they were filed after the deadline. In a vdare essay, March explains why so many of the claimants delayed submitting their claims:
Many of these tardy filers were afraid to file because they feared the whole process was a government "trap" to jail them for fraud. Only after they saw friends and neighbors actually receiving the $50,000 for claims they knew to be phony did their greed overcome their fear—butby then the deadline had passed.President Obama has long championed these cautious swindlers.In 2007, then-Senator Obama charged that "thousands of black farmers who had valid claims were denied relief, mostly because they missed the cut-off date for claims."Now that Obama has allocated $1.25bn in the 2010 budget to settle their claims, many of these 70,000 swindlers will receive their $50,000 windfall.Most of the information in this article comes from Louis T. March's book "Harvest of Lies: The Black Farmer Lawsuit Against the U.S. Department of Agriculture." The book can be purchased from The Occidental Press.
Q. How many minority farmers are there?
A. Minority farm operators, however defined, make up a small share of all U.S. farmers. Most minority farmers operate small farms, although most small farms are not operated by minorities. Census of agriculture data are often used to examine the characteristics of minority operators. Although other sources of data provide information on minority farmers, census data extend further into the past and provide reliable statistics for very small minorities, particularly at the State level.
Obtaining a count of minority farmers is difficult because some of the groups overlap. According to the 1997 Census of Agriculture, 47,700 farm operators, or 2.5 percent of all U.S. farm operators, were nonwhite. These included 18,500 Blacks, 10,600 American Indians, 8,700 Asians or Pacific Islanders, and 9,800 “others.” About 27,700 Hispanics also farmed. Approximately 9,000 of the Hispanic operators, however, are also included in the nonwhite count, since Hispanics may be of any race.
Although women are a majority in the U.S. population, they are a minority among farm operators. Only 165,100 farm operators, or 8.6 percent of the U.S. total, were women in 1997, but their numbers are increasing. Of these, 5,100 were included in the nonwhite count and 2,500 were Hispanic. The Census Bureau counts only one primary operator per farm; it does not classify women who farm alongside their husbands as operators, unless they are the primary operators.

Pigford v. Glickman was a class action lawsuit against the United States Department of Agriculture (the "USDA"), alleging racial discrimination in its allocation of farm loans and assistance between 1983 and 1997. The lawsuit ended with a settlement in which the U.S. government agreed to pay African American farmers US$50,000 each if they had attempted to get USDA help but failed. To date, almost US$1 billion has been paid or credited to the farmers under the settlement's consent decree.
1 Case history
2 Payouts
3 Subsequent events
4 See also
5 References
[edit] Case history
The lawsuit was filed in 1997 by Timothy Pigford, who was joined by 400 additional African American farmer plaintiffs. Dan Glickman, the Secretary of Agriculture, was the nominal defendant. The allegations were that the USDA treated black farmers unfairly when deciding to allocate price support loans, disaster payments, "farm ownership" loans, and operating loans, and that the USDA had completely failed to process subsequent complaints about racial discrimination.[1]
After the lawsuit was filed, Pigford requested blanket mediation to cover what was thought to be about 2,000 farmers who may have been discriminated against, but the U.S. Department of Justice opposed the mediation, saying that each case had to be investigated separately. As the case moved toward trial, the presiding judge certified as a class all black farmers who filed discrimination complaints against the USDA between 1983 and 1997.
The plaintiffs settled with the government in 1999. Under the consent decree, all African American farmers would be paid a "virtually automatic" US$50,000 plus granted certain loan forgiveness and tax offsets, if they could present substantial evidence that they had been discriminated against on the basis of race. To do so, they needed to show that they had applied to the USDA for farm credit or benefits, had to have made a complaint before 1997, and had to show that the USDA had treated them less favorably than the USDA had treated similarly-situated white farmers. This process was called "Track A".[2]
Alternatively, affected farmers could follow the "Track B" process, seeking a larger payment by presenting a greater amount of evidence — the legal standard in this case was to have a preponderance of evidence along with evidence of greater damages.
[edit] Payouts
Originally, claimants were to have filed within 180 days of the consent decree. Late claims were accepted for an additional year afterwards, if they could show extraordinary circumstances that prevented them from filing on time.
Far beyond the anticipated 2,000 affected farmers, 22,505 "Track A" applications were heard and decided upon, of which 13,348 (59%) were approved. US$995 million had been disbursed or credited to the "Track A" applicants as of January 2009
[update], including US$760 million disbursed as US$50,000 cash awards.[3] Fewer than 200 farmers opted for the "Track B" process.
Beyond those applications that were heard and decided upon, about 70,000 petitions were filed late and were not allowed to proceed. Some have argued that the notice program was defective, and others blamed the farmers' attorneys for "the inadequate notice and overall mismanagement of the settlement agreement". A provision in the 2008 farm bill essentially allowed a re-hearing in civil court for any claimant whose claim had been denied without a decision that had been based on its merits.
edit] Subsequent events
In 2004, the
Black Farmers and Agriculturalists Association filed a US$20.5 billion class action lawsuit against the USDA for the same practices, alleging racially discriminatory practices between 1997 and 2004. The lawsuit was dismissed when the BFAA failed to show it had standing to bring the suit.
[edit] See also
List of class action lawsuits
[edit] References
^ Timothy Pigford, et al., v. Dan Glickman, Secretary, United States Department of Agriculture, US District Court for the District of Columbia, Civil Action No. 97-1978 (PLF). Paul L. Friedman, U.S. District Judge.
^ "The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers", Tadlock Cowan, Congressional Research Service, January 13, 2009. Fetched February 9, 2009 from [1].
^ "The Pigford Case: USDA Settlement of a Discrimination Suit by Black Farmers", p. 5. Tadlock Cowan, Congressional Research Service, January 13, 2009. Fetched February 9, 2009 from [2].
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigford_v._Glickman"

The Poverty Vultures Sink To New Low!

Rent a Rim
Rent a rim is the hot way to get you rolling. Got yourself a hopped-up hoopty and need a little extra bling for that thing? Rent a rim can get you those flashy new rims to give anybody on your block a little rim envy. It was Jenny who said don’t be fooled by the rims that I got, right? Jenny obviously doesn’t need to rent a rim, but some of us really do need some rocks on our block. Those blinging road-rocks rent a rim provides for all you playas.To rent a rim or to not rent a rim, that is the question
Why rent a rim when you can just buy a rim and be that much tighter than the hommie next door. If you rent a rim, you’re just stuck making payments and your rims will never be your own rollin’, hip-hop flowin’ rims. Why not just buy a rim? Rent a rim might be your source for immediate gratification, but what about rims for down the road? If you rent a rim you can’t just give you cousin Lou the rims for his b-day, or graduation, you’re stuck sending those suckers back to the rent a rim store.Buy a rim not rent a rim
Here at Mypaydayloan.com, your buy a rim not rent a rim source, we give you the money you need to buy yourself a hot set of 20s. Spinners anyone? You might need to rent a rim if they’re spinners, because only cash money millionaires got spinners. But you don’t need to rent a rim if they just some blinging 22s for that dunk. So get a payday loan from Mypaydayloan.com, where you don’t have to rent a rim, you can buy that rim.

Free no fax pay day loans, and payday advances with no credit checks of up to $1000 are wired overnight.*

Payday Cash Advance Loan
Payday loans are short-term cash advances designed to meet your emergency financial needs. Payday loans are also perfect for those times when you need a little extra cash for unexpected bills or special occasions. The fee for a cash advance is $25.00 for every $100.00 borrowed. For example, loans in the amount of $300.00 have a payback amount of $375.00. Payday loans are generally paid back within two weeks, however, you can extend the payday loan. To extend a loan you simply make at least the minimum payment owed on the cash advance. First-time borrowers of payday loans can request up to $600.00.
How to get a no fax cash advance
There are very few requirements for a no fax payday loan: a checking account that is at least 90 days old, employment of at least 6 months, and a monthly net income of at least $1000.00. The application process for a free payday loan* is simple; no faxing is required. If your online cash advance application is approved by 5 pm est, monday - friday, then you will receive the cash overnight. You can apply for a $400 loan and no faxing is required at all.
How do payday loans work?
Once your payday loans application is approved, you will receive the funds in your checking account the next business day. You will then be asked to submit a payment request which tells us how much you want to pay on your personal loans when it is due. Be sure to submit a request or the entire amount will be debited from your account by default. When payday loans are due, the money is debited directly from your checking account on your due date. Once you have paid off your payday loans, you can continue to apply for bad credit payday loans of up to $1000.00.* If you are a free loan customer, finance fees are waived on your payday advance when you submit a cash advance payment request online to pay the pay day loan in full on your due date. The free loan program is run as a promotion and may not always be available.
Mission Statement
Our mission for Mypaydayloan.com is to manage an online service where clients can obtain a payday loan with the utmost confidentiality and convenience. We strive to empathize with our customers' needs and maintain a consumer friendly website that is easy to understand. Mypaydayloan works to provide financial services that meet our clients needs by providing quick, helpful, and outstanding customer service. As a company, we will strive to increase our client base consistently by satisfying our clients, and encouraging their future business. Our goal is to be the number one payday loan site on the Internet through dedication, hard work, and customer loyalty.
The Cost of Credit - Facts You Need To Know!
Christmas Payday loans are small cash loans & short-term advances that are due on your next payday, unless your next payday is 4 days away from your loan date interest is charged at flat fee. In this case your Holiday Cash will be due on your second payday. The maximum loan term is 14 days. With a payday loan you are charged a flat fee no matter when your cash loan is repaid (subject to the 14 day maximum loan term). Because the fees are fixed per loan amount, the Annual Percentage Rate (APR) will vary depending on the number of days that pass between the date you receive your advance and the day you repay the loan. There is no refund of fees for early repayment.
Although payday loans are short-term advances intended to be paid off quickly, various Truth-in-Lending laws require financing disclosures to be expressed as an Annual Percentage Rate (APR), or the cost of the credit advanced to you expressed as an annual rate. This requirement provides uniformity among various credit sources, so you can compare rates and make the choice that is right for you.
The following table provides examples of the cost to obtain a payday loan. The APRs are based on example loan terms of one payment ("Check Amount") due in 18, 14, and 7 days. The APR will increase if the actual loan term is shorter than these examples.
LOAN AMOUNT (Amount Financed)
LOAN TERM: 1 PAYMENT (# of Days)
LOAN FEE (Finance Charge)
CHECK AMOUNT (Total of Payments)

We’ll deliver the Christmas payday loan faster than by sleigh
Christmas payday loan lenders are a few and far between. Ever wonder if you could get a payroll loan just for the holidays. Most people don’t feel guilt when applying for a Christmas payday loan, because just about every American family could use a payroll loan for the holidays. A Christmas payday loan could be use to help ease the expenses associated with Christmas. A Christmas payday loan could help out with the tree, or a cash advance could certainly help out with last minute gifts.We know it can be a hard time during the holidays, that’s why some people seek out a cash advance. A Christmas payday loan should be designed to help you and a Christmas payday loan shouldn’t cost you money. That’s why we can give you a free cash advance. Just pay off your Christmas payday loan by your next payday and you can get a free Christmas payday loan.
Our check loan gets deposited into your checking account in no time. Let's say you run out of money a couple of days before Christmas and need a check loan quick. You could apply for a check loan the day before Christmas Eve and still get it by Christmas. You may even get the payroll advance on Christmas Eve, so that you can use your payroll advance that day to buy last minute presents.


Gmail Cyclops Warrior

Link Removal Request for cyclopswarrior.blogspot.tw
1 message

Stephanie Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM
To: Fellow Website Owner
Monday 11th of February 2013 12:31:41 PM

Fellow Website Owner

Dear Fellow Website Owner:

It has come to our attention that a number of links exist on your domain which are directed to our website mypaydayloan.com.  We have determined that these links may be harmful either to the future marketing and reputation of mypaydayloan.com, or to our users.

Accordingly, we request that you (A) remove all existing links to mypaydayloan.com from your domain, including, but not limited to the following URLs:


       (B) Cease creation of any additional links to mypaydayloan.com

       (C) provide us with prompt notification once links to mypaydayloan.com have been removed either by return email, or using the link below.

        This request is being made because your domain may fit within one or more of the following categories: infected with malware; low quality site; paid link provider; manipulative link activity; link exchange networks; or simply not a good fit for mypaydayloan.com.

Please note, we are currently penalized by Google for manipulative linking. If you do not remove these links, or at least add the "nofollow" tag to them, you may be penalized for linking to us. Removing these links helps your site and ours.

      Thanking you in anticipation of your co-operation in removing these links at your earliest convenience.



The following url will allow you to let us know that the links were removed.  This url is
provided only for ease of use.  If you are not comfortable with clicking a link please email us back and let us know it is done.

If you believe this email has come to you in error please click the link above and report it.