Here We Go Again! O'bama And His Attorney General Once Again Siding With The Criminal Element To Ensure Their "Rights" Remain Intact, But What About The Rights Of Hard Working Americans And By The Way, How Can You Say You're Protecting America By Siding With These Terrorists?!

Warrior Is So Pissed Off!

Muslim Scum

Motherfucker Had A Great Job, Newly Married A 6 Month Old Kid Brainwashed By The Muslim religious Kooks Fuck Him

Fuck These Cunts - oh Yeah, The Babe Was 29 NOT 27

Clockboys' Family Sued Texas Officials For 15 Million For "wrongful" arrest Or some shit, Of Course O'bama wants a full Scale "Civil Rights" Investigation> The Kid Is A Dope, He Is no scientific genius - He'll be lucky to get a factory job tha pays $11 bucks an hour.  Why Is O'bama And His Attorney General Bending Over Backwards And Kissing These PPeople Asses After A Bunch Of Americans Were Slaughter By Muslim Religious Kooks?

You Fucking Apologists - Fuck You And Your Fucked Up Religion Stay Out Of My Life

This Is What They Found At The Muslim Terrorists House Sort Of Like What "Clockboy" Had Built Isn't It?

Here's "ClockBoy" With The Butcher Of Darfur. Yep, They're Good Buddies Alright! He Wants To Come Back To The US - FUCK HIM!

Even Their Own Kind Know How Dangerous These Muslim Religious Kooks Are

San Bernadino Strong Absolutely Right

We Heard That There Were 3 Shooters. Hmmmm, What Happened To The 3rd Suspect? Skousen Says He Knows....

THE NEW YORK TIMES RUNS A FRONT PAGE EDITORIAL FOR THE FIRST TIME SINCE THE 1920'S. HERE IT IS.

 NYT Front Page Editorial
 ULTIMATE DOUBLE DOWN -
 "No right is unlimited and immune from reasonable regulation."
NY Times Editorial Today
Does the subject even matter after this?
Perhaps we should restrict and regulate freedom of speech from suggesting impingement on the Bill of Rights?
Or eliminate or regulate birthright citizenship.
This is the kind of logic we are seeing from the NYT
Of course they want to deal with the 2nd Amendment of a Bill of Rights so important Jefferson told Madison the Constitution was unacceptable without the 1st 10 Amendments he worked with Madison on, being ratified WITH IT.
Why?
Because those rights are COMPULSORY to protect individuals and small minorities from BOTH the govt and the majority.
And the NYT wants to regulate the protection of individuals and minorities, and for that regulation to come from the EXACT INSTITUTION those Amendments exist to protect each one of us from.
Let’s start with regulation of the bona fides of editorial boards of newspapers by whatever govt is elected by the people that year?


http://ibloga.blogspot.com/

WELL, WELL, WELL. VERY INTERESTING. THE ATTORNEY GENERAL WANTS TO CURB FREE SPEECH IF PEOPLE EXPRESS NEGATIVE "OPINIONS" ABOUT MUSLIMS. AND THE TIMES WANTS TO OUTLAW GUNS. A FULL SCALE FRONTAL ASSAULT ON THE BILL OF RIGHTS BY THE VERY INSTITUTIONS AND PEOPLE WHO ENJOY THEIR PROTECTIONS.

SO WHEN O'BAMA CAN BARELY SAY THAT THE TERRORIST ATTACK IN SAN BERNADINO WAS THE RESULT OF MUSLIM TERRORISTS AND HAS HIS ATTORNEY GENERAL GO TO BAT FOR THE MUSLIMS SO THAT THEY ARE NOT MALTREATED BY AMERICANS WHO ARE MIGHTY PISSED THAT O'BAMA HAS ALLOWED THIS TO OCCUR IN OUR COUNTRY, WELL THEN IT'S TIME TO GET A NEW PRESIDENT AND GET NEW ELECTED REPRESENTATIVES BECAUSE THE ONES WE HAVE NOW CERTAINLY DON'T LIVE UP TO OUR EXPECTATIONS AND OUR REQUIREMENTS. 

IT'S TOO BAD ABOUT O'BAMA.HE HAD POTENTIAL, BUT HE SQUANDERED LIKE THE CHEAP POLITICIAN HE REALLY IS. I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL HE IS OUT OF OFFICE WHICH WILL BE NONE TOO SOON.