Original Story Here At This Link |
THEN I SHRUGGED AND TOLD MYSELF, "IT'S A FUCKING CONSPIRACY BY THE CRIMINAL MEDIA TO NOT REPORT FACTS IF THEY ARE POLITICALLY INCORRECT!"
I KNOW THIS WAS AN INTENTIONAL OMISSION AND A GLARING EXAMPLE OF HOW THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA INSTEAD OF, REPORTING THE FACTS OF THE STORY, GIVE US A LINE OF CRAP SO IT IS MORE PALATABLE TO THE CULTURAL MARXISTS AND RACE BAITERS OUT THEIR WHO MIGHT ACCUSE THE NEWSPAPER OF "RACISM" FOR REPORTING THAT THE COPS ARE ON THE LOOK OUT FOR A BLACK SUSPECT AND SUE THEIR ASSES.
I'M SICK OF THESE RACE EXTORTIONISTS WHO TELL AN OLD ESTABLISHED NEWSPAPER LIKE THE INDIANPOLIS STAR THAT THEY CANNOT REPORT FACTS THAT ARE PERTINENT TO THE STORY. MAYBE THE EDITORS ARE FRAIDY CATS WHO ARE INSTRUCTED BY THE PUBLISHER TO ERR ON THE SIDE OF CAUTION WHEN REPORTING A STORY SO THEY WON'T BE SUED! BUT WHO EVER HEARD OF A NEWSPAPER BEING SUED FOR REPORTING FACTS AS THEY ARE? RIDICULOUS.
HERE'S THE LETTER I WROTE TO THE INTREPID REPORTER. I'M SURPRISED THE DESCRIPTION WAS NOT EVEN MORE GENERIC, SAY..., SECURITY CAMERAS SHOW A "YOUNG PERSON"..., WELL, YOU GET THE IDEA.
OH, BY THE WAY, I TOLD HER THAT I WAS PUBLISHING MY LETTER TO HER ON THIS BLOG. IT WILL BE INTERESTING TO SEE IF SHE RESPONDS AT ALL. I HIGHLY DOUBT IT, BUT WHAT'S BECOME OF PRINT JOURNALISM WHEN THE PUSSIFIED REPORTERS ARE AFRAID TO REPORT THE FACTS BECAUSE THEY MAY INCONVENIENTLY BE POLITICALLY INCORRECT?
Blackburn's memorial service article
I've
never met you and I have no idea what type of person you are, but
when I read your article on the Amanda Blackburn memorial service,
you certainly gave me a huge clue.
In
the description of the suspect on the home security footage you
identify him only as a male. Now the police state that the suspect in
the video is a BLACK male.
My
question to you is why did you leave the suspects race out? The
race of the subject is of huge importance to your readership as it
more accurately describes the suspect instead of referring to him as
you did soley as "a male".
I
am sure this was done intentionally in order for you and your editors
to maintain the "politically correct" way your newspaper
handles "sensitive race relations"with the
Indianapolis community. However, this is not reporting, it is
editorializing the news in order to act in a criminal manner to
manipulate the news for a political purpose.
I
have attached a snip of the relevant part of the article to show you
the writer why this stood out like a black bear on an iceflow.
I
don't know why you cannot report the facts as they are. The
Indianapolis black community knows that the cops are looking for a
black suspect, so, mentionng this FACT, would not put the black
community in a bad light.
I
read that you are the recipient of a Eugene C. Pulliam
fellowship.In Mr.
Pulliams Wikipedia writeup,
it states that he was an "outspoken
advocate of freedom of the press".Also,
as one of the great American newspaper publishers of the 20th
century, Pulliam would have never allowed such sloppy reporting
on one of the most important crime stories to hit Indianapolis in a
decade.
The
facts are, a home invader robbed and raped a pregnant pastor's wife in the
sanctity of her home and then shot her in the head killing her. Now
young lady, if you think you can stand by the story and describe the
suspect only as a male, then maybe you need to quit the newspaper
business and go to work for the liberals over at MSNBC!
I'm
sick of the news media coddling minorities when they are involved in
a heinous crime like this by refusing to report their race. Is the
reason being you don't want to put minorities in a "bad light"?
Well, whatever your logic is, I certainly do not pretend to know why
you are averse to reporting THE FACTS. That's a newspapers job - to
report the facts. Leave the editorializing to the editors.
Here's
the link to
your story as I read it and I have attached a snip of the offending
segment of your story for you to review. Also, I will be publishing
my letter to you by me, on my blog, which
is, www.cyclopswarrior.blogspot.com.
Thank
you for taking the time to read this letter. Perhaps you should
discuss my points with your editors. I hope that my suggestions will
make you more cognizant of how we as the consumers of your stories
feel when you leave out crucial details, especially when the are
pertinent to the facts of the story itself.
Sincerely,
Warrior
USA
WELL, MAYBE MS.FERREIRA NEEDS TO GO OVER TO PAUL KERSEY'S BLOG AND READ THE OVER 50 STORIES HE HAS ON HIS SITE ABOUT HOW THE CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS IS BEING HELD HOSTAGE BY THE BLACK CRIMINAL ELEMENT. OH SURE, THE CITIZENS THERE TRY TO PUT A BRAVE FACE ON IT, BUT THE PLACE IS SPIRALING INTO ANARCHY AS BLACK CRIMINALS OPERATE THERE WITH IMPUNITY AND NOTHING CAN STOP THEM.IF YOU GO TO KERSEY'S BLOG, USE THE SEARCH ENGINE AND TYPE IN "INDIANPOLIS". KERSEY HAS CHRONICLED DOZENS OF STORIES ABOUT THE BLACK UNDERTOW IN THE CITY AND HOW IT IS DRAGGING THE WHOLE CITY AND COUNTY DOWN WITH THEM AND IT CANNOT BE REVERSED!
ANOTHER ONCE GREAT AMERICAN CITY CEDED TO THE BLACK UNDERTOW. JUST ANOTHER MODERN DAY PLANTATION WHERE BLACKS CAN KICK BACK AND LIVE ON THE DOLE, SUPPORTED BY GUESS WHO? YOU THE TAXPAYER! HA, HA, HA, HA, HA!!!!! THINK I'M KIDDING? HELL, BALTIMORE JUST REACHED ANOTHER MILESTONE UNDER BLACK DEMOCRAT RULE! CONGRATULATIONS FUCKERS!
WELL, IT TURNS OUT THE STAR REPORTER HAD MORE FACTS AT HER DISPOSAL THAN SHE LET ON IN THE STORY. TODAY IS SATURDAY, NOVEMBER 27, IT'S AFTER MIDNIGHT AND GOING OVER THIS BLACKBURN STORY IS DISTURBING ON A NUMBER OF LEVELS BUT WHEN THE NEWSPAPER OF RECORD IN INDIANAPOLIS DECIDES TO PLAY PC POLITICS AND SANITIZE IT'S NEWS, WELL THEN, THEY'VE CROSSED THE LINE FORM JOURNALISM TO CENSORSHIP AND PROPAGANDA.
THE NEWSPAPER REPORTER APPEARED TO LEAVE OUT CRUCIAL FACTS N THE DESCRIPTION OF THE SUSPECTS CAUGHT ON SECURITY CAMERAS NEAR THE BLACKBURNS HOME. THERE ARE PROBABLY BETTER PICTURES THAN THE ONES THAT THEY RELEASED, BUT WHAT REALLY TOOK ME ABACK WAS THE REPORT THAT THE SUSPECTS HAD OBTAINED BLACKBURN'S BANKCARD AND MADE MULTIPLE WITHDRAWALS OF CASH FROM VARIOUS ATMS, THEREBY PROVIDING CLEAR FRONTAL, FACIAL SHOTS OF THE PERSON OPERATING THE ATM. NOW DID THE STAR REPORTER HAVE THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE WHEN PUBLISHED ONLINE AND IN PRINT. WHY DID NO SUBSEQUENT NEWS STORIES CARRY THESE RELEVANT FACTS AND PUBLISH THE PICTURES OF THE SUSPECTS? WHERE WAS THE COOPERATION BETWEEN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE MEDIA? WHY WEREN'T THE PICTURES OF THE SUSPECTS WIDELY DISSEMINATED IF THEY HAD GOOD CLEAR PHOTOS?
I WROTE THE REPORTER AGAIN TONIGHT POSING THESE SAME QUESTIONS..., HERE'S THE E-MAIL. I DON'T EXPECCT A REPLY, BUT HOW THE PAPER HANDLED THIS STORY AND TURNED IT INTO AN EXERCISE OF PC POLTICS RATHER THAN NEWSPAPER JOURNALISM SHOWS US HOW THE MEDIA IN THIS COUNTRY CAN NO LONGER BE TRUSTED AND YOU MUST FIND OUT INFORMATION ON YOUR OWN BEFORE YOU MAKE UP YOUR MIND. TAKING ANY NEWS SOURCE AT ITS WORD IS DANGEROUS AND FRAUGHT WITH RAMIFICATIONS. JUST A WORD TO THE WISE TO BE BETTER CONSUMERS OF MEDIA AND DON'T LET THE PC SOCIAL ENGINEERS CRAM THIS CRAP DOWN YOUR THROAT.
NEW E-MAIL TO STAR REPORTER NOVEMBER 28TH, 2015
gabrielle.ferreira@indystar.com
Sanitizing The News To Fit PC Agenda
Hi,
Earlier in the month I sent you an e-mail regarding your story about the suspect in the Amanda Blackburn murder case.
Well, it seems, that not only did you leave out critical details in the suspects description, describing him only as a "male". New information has come to light that there were photos taken from ATM dispensers where the suspects withdrew cash using Blackburn's bank cards.
Now, I can only assume that you intentionally misled your readership by not providing them with the facts as you knew them at the time the story went to print. That's my conclusion. I don't pretend to know what the politics of the news is in today's newsrooms in newspapers across the country, but as a print journalist, you misled your readers when you should have provided every fact available to you. You are a reporter and not an editor. If your story was edited to cut this information out of your story because it did not fit with the "Stars" PC views, well you may as well find another profession, because you are being censored.,
Here's my blog post and the original letter I e-mailed to you.
http://cyclopswarrior.blogspot.com/2015/11/indianapolis-star-reporter-leaves-out.html
Thank you for your time and attention to this apparent minor matter which speaks volumes about how your paper acts as a gatekeeper and censors the facts of the news.Frankly, I feel lied to and misled.
W
SO IT APPEARS THAT THE STARS' REPORTERS KNEW DAMN WELL THE I'D OF THE SUSPECTS BUT SANITIZED THE DESCRIPTION SO AS NO TO PUT MINORITIES IN A BAD LIGHT. INDIANAPOLIS IS A HOTBED OF BLACK CRIME IN RECENT YEARS. CITY FATHERS AND LONG TIME RESIDENTS ARE QUESTIONING THE SAFETY OF THEIR BELOVED CITY UNDER THE BLACK CRIMINAL ONSLAUGHT. THE CITY HAS BECOME A VIRTUAL NO MANS LAND WHEN THE SUN SETS DURING THE WARMER MONTHS OF THE YEAR AND BLACK THUGS RULE THE MEAN STREETS OF WHAT WAS ONCE, A GREAT AMERICAN CITY. INDIANAPOLIS, INDIANA ANOTHER AMERICAN CITY CEDED OVER TO THE BLACK UNDERTOW.
THE NEWSPAPER REPORTER APPEARED TO LEAVE OUT CRUCIAL FACTS N THE DESCRIPTION OF THE SUSPECTS CAUGHT ON SECURITY CAMERAS NEAR THE BLACKBURNS HOME. THERE ARE PROBABLY BETTER PICTURES THAN THE ONES THAT THEY RELEASED, BUT WHAT REALLY TOOK ME ABACK WAS THE REPORT THAT THE SUSPECTS HAD OBTAINED BLACKBURN'S BANKCARD AND MADE MULTIPLE WITHDRAWALS OF CASH FROM VARIOUS ATMS, THEREBY PROVIDING CLEAR FRONTAL, FACIAL SHOTS OF THE PERSON OPERATING THE ATM. NOW DID THE STAR REPORTER HAVE THIS INFORMATION AVAILABLE WHEN PUBLISHED ONLINE AND IN PRINT. WHY DID NO SUBSEQUENT NEWS STORIES CARRY THESE RELEVANT FACTS AND PUBLISH THE PICTURES OF THE SUSPECTS? WHERE WAS THE COOPERATION BETWEEN LAW ENFORCEMENT AND THE MEDIA? WHY WEREN'T THE PICTURES OF THE SUSPECTS WIDELY DISSEMINATED IF THEY HAD GOOD CLEAR PHOTOS?
I WROTE THE REPORTER AGAIN TONIGHT POSING THESE SAME QUESTIONS..., HERE'S THE E-MAIL. I DON'T EXPECCT A REPLY, BUT HOW THE PAPER HANDLED THIS STORY AND TURNED IT INTO AN EXERCISE OF PC POLTICS RATHER THAN NEWSPAPER JOURNALISM SHOWS US HOW THE MEDIA IN THIS COUNTRY CAN NO LONGER BE TRUSTED AND YOU MUST FIND OUT INFORMATION ON YOUR OWN BEFORE YOU MAKE UP YOUR MIND. TAKING ANY NEWS SOURCE AT ITS WORD IS DANGEROUS AND FRAUGHT WITH RAMIFICATIONS. JUST A WORD TO THE WISE TO BE BETTER CONSUMERS OF MEDIA AND DON'T LET THE PC SOCIAL ENGINEERS CRAM THIS CRAP DOWN YOUR THROAT.
NEW E-MAIL TO STAR REPORTER NOVEMBER 28TH, 2015
gabrielle.ferreira@indystar.com
Sanitizing The News To Fit PC Agenda
Hi,
Earlier in the month I sent you an e-mail regarding your story about the suspect in the Amanda Blackburn murder case.
Well, it seems, that not only did you leave out critical details in the suspects description, describing him only as a "male". New information has come to light that there were photos taken from ATM dispensers where the suspects withdrew cash using Blackburn's bank cards.
Now, I can only assume that you intentionally misled your readership by not providing them with the facts as you knew them at the time the story went to print. That's my conclusion. I don't pretend to know what the politics of the news is in today's newsrooms in newspapers across the country, but as a print journalist, you misled your readers when you should have provided every fact available to you. You are a reporter and not an editor. If your story was edited to cut this information out of your story because it did not fit with the "Stars" PC views, well you may as well find another profession, because you are being censored.,
Here's my blog post and the original letter I e-mailed to you.
http://cyclopswarrior.blogspot.com/2015/11/indianapolis-star-reporter-leaves-out.html
Thank you for your time and attention to this apparent minor matter which speaks volumes about how your paper acts as a gatekeeper and censors the facts of the news.Frankly, I feel lied to and misled.
W
The Criminal Media Censors And Sanitizes The News For Its PC Agend..., Can You Say, "Mind Control"? |
No comments:
Post a Comment