You Tube Selectiely Censors Conservative Speech All While Allowing Racists' Duke + Farracoon To Remain Active And Collect Ad Revenue! What Is Wrong With THIS Picture?!

I BELIEVE THERE IS A CLASS ACTION SUIT IN THE OFFING AGAINST THE INTERNET BEHEMOTHS FOR DE-PLATFORMING CONSERVATIVE VOICES WITH NO REASON GIVEN OTHER THAN "VIOLATING TERMS OF SERVICE"! MANY OF THE VARIED CONSERVATIVE VOICES HAVE NOW GONE SILENT DUE TO HAVING THEIR ACCESS TO THEIR ACCOUNTS ON GOOGLE, BLOGGER, YOUTUBE, WORDPRESS, TWITTER, FACEBOOK AND INSTAGRAM ALONG WITH VARIOUS OTHER SOCIAL NETWORK SITES SHUT DOWN. ALONG WITH LOSING AD REVENUE, THESE INTERNET BEHEMOTHS ALSO DELETED 10'S OF THOUSANDS OF HOURS WORTH OF ORIGINAL CONTENT WITHOUT NOTICE TO THE CONTENT PROVIDERS AND HOSTS WITH THE PUSH OF A BUTTON! NOT ONLY DID THESE ACTIONS DEPRIVE THE OWNER OF THE CHANNEL OR SITE LOSE THE CHANCE TO BACK UP THERE CONTENT, BUT THEY WHERE BUSHWHACKED BY THE OPERATORS OF THE HOSTING COMPANY WHO TOOK THEIR SITES DOWN WITHOUT WARNING AND LEFT THEM ABSOLUTEY NO AVENUE OF APPEAL.

THIS WILL BE AN EXTREMELY IMPORTANT FIRST AMENDMENT ISSUE THAT WILL HAVE TO BE DECIDED BY THE COURTS. HOW IS IT YOU CAN HAVE A DAVID DUKE OR A LOUIS FARRACOON, AVOWED RACIST, AND RACE NATIONALISTS OPERATED ON THESE PLATFORMS WITH IMPUNITY YET AT THE SAME TIME BAN AN ALEX JONES, A HAL TURNER, OR A SABOTEUR365?
MOST CONSTITUTIONAL EXPERTS AGREE, HOWEVER MUCH THEY DISAGREE WITH YOUR POINT OF VIEW OR YOUR BIGOTED, RACIST, FAR RIGHT OR LEFT POLITICS, YOU STILL HAVE A RIGHT TO EXPRESS YOUR "OPINIONS" ABOUT THESE VIEWS AS LONG AS YOU DO NOT CALL FOR VIOLENCE OR VIOLENT INSURRECTION OR CALL TO DO HARM TO PROPERTY OR OTHER PEOPLE. IF YOUR VIEWS TEND TO INCITE PEOPLE TO THIS END, THEN YOU WILL BE CAREFULLY SCRUTINIZED AND PERHAPS VISITED IN PERSON BY THE AUTHORITIES WHICH HAS A CAUSE FOR CONCERN THAT MUST BE VETTED.

IN THE MEANTIME, UNTIL THIS DAY OF RECKONING OCCURS IN THE COURTS, THESE ITERNET BEHEMOTHS CONTINUE TO DO WHAT THEY DAMN WELL PLEASE TO CENSOR CONTENT THEY DEEM AS "POLITICALLY INCORRECT" AND AGAINST THEIR "VALUES". I MUST ADD, THAT THERE IS A NEED FOR THEM TO SELF POLICE FOR VILE, ILLEGAL CONTENT, BUT POLITICAL SPEECH FALLS UNDER PROTECTED SPEECH AND IS THEREFORE BASICALLY NOT IN THEIR PURVIEW TO REGULATE OR CENSOR NOW MATTER WHAT THEIR POSITION IS TODAY. THIS WILL EVENTUALLY BE DECIDED AND THE PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN DE-PLATFORMED, BANNED, SHADOWBANNED AND CENSORED, HAVE A RIGHT TO BE MADE WHOLE WITH MONETARY AWARDS AND DAMAGES IN MY OPINION. THIS IS THE COST OF FREE SPEECH. WHEN AN INTERNET ENTITY DEEMS ITSELF THE ARBITER OF FREE SPEECH, THE IT REALLY SAYS THAT WE SUPERCEDE THE AUTHORITY OF THE LAWS OF THE UNITED STATES AND WE CAN DO WHATEVER WE DAMN WELL PLEASE! AN INTERESTING PERSPECTIVE WHEN THEY APPEAL TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.