HERE'S HILLARY'S DOSSIER, UNLIKE THE PHONEY PEE DOSSIER THAT WAS CONCOCTED BY TRUMP'S ENEMIES. LOOK AT HER PEDIGREE AND YOU WILL SEE WHY THEY SO BADLY WANTED HER CORONATED AS THE QUEEN BEE OF THE HIVE!...,
She
said President Obama was wrong not to launch missile strikes on Syria
in 2013.
She
pushed hard for the overthrow of Qadaffi in 2011.
She
supported the coup government in Honduras in 2009. (Where do those
refugees come from, again?)
She
long backed escalation and prolongation of war in Afghanistan.
She
voted for the 2003 invasion of Iraq.
She
skillfully promoted the White House justification for the war on
Iraq.
She
did not hesitate to back the use of drones for targeted killing.
She
consistently backed the military initiatives of Israel.
She
was not ashamed to laugh at the killing of Qadaffi.
She
did not hesitate to warn that she could obliterate Iran.
She
was not afraid to antagonize Russia.
She
helped facilitate a military coup in Ukraine.
She
had the financial support of the arms makers and many of their
foreign customers.
She
waived restrictions at the State Department on selling weapons to
Saudi Arabia, Algeria, Kuwait, United Arab Emirates, Oman, and Qatar,
all states wise enough to donate to the Clinton Foundation.
She
supported President Bill Clinton’s wars and the power of the
president to make war without Congress.
She
advocated for arming fighters in Syria.
She
supported an escalation in Iraq even before President Bush did.
Here
are comments from a few of her supporters:
“For
this former Republican, and perhaps for others, the only choice will
be to vote for Hillary Clinton. The party cannot be saved, but the
country still can be.” —Robert Kagan
“I
have a sense that she’s one of the more competent members of the
current administration and it would be interesting to speculate about
how she might perform were she to be president.” —Dick Cheney
“I’ve
known her for many years now, and I respect her intellect. And she
ran the State Department in the most effective way that I’ve ever
seen.” —Henry Kissinger
Welch
objects to criticism of Hillary Clinton’s financial corruption, and
associates such criticism with trying to connect Barack Obama to
Paris Hilton or questioning John Kerry’s war-heroism, suggesting I
guess that Hillary Clinton’s financial corruption is either
nonexistent or heroically militaristic.
The
2007 escalation of the war on Iraq, for Welch, was the work of
President George W. Bush and not in any way of the Democratic
Congress that had just been elected to end that war. Meanwhile, the
2009 escalation of the war on Afghanistan doesn’t exist or isn’t
worth mentioning. In fact, the whole presidency of Barack Obama
almost doesn’t exist in various sections of this book which
repeatedly leaps from accounts of Bush’s outrages right into
Trump’s as if there was no gap between them during which the same
or very similar outrages continued.
This
partisanship is paralleled in its division of people into good and
bad groups by Welch’s patriotism. Welch explicitly claims that
nations, not just actual individual people, can go through mental
processes. He writes that the crimes of 9-11 traumatized a nation and
its people, including Welch himself, because for the first time —
and apparently the last time — violent deaths occurred in world
history. And those deaths were all of “Americans,” Welch writes,
and therefore worth acknowledging, he implies, ignoring the 12% or so
of the 9-11 victims who were not from the United States. This sort of
attitude, in which mass slaughters by the U.S. military before and
after 9-11 are not “traumatizing” but 9-11 is, results from an
extreme and extremely accepted sort of bigotry, but it also causes it
by suggesting the same view to readers.
The
war on Iraq of 2003 was, according to Welch, the “first openly
acknowledged preemptive war in American history,” and waging it had
negative effects “for our country” and apparently for nobody else
worth mentioning. I wonder if any Iraqis were hurt? According to
Welch, “America,” and not just its government, is responsible for
the wars on Afghanistan and Iraq and the creation of ISIS. But Welch
acknowledges that Bush was eager for war on Iraq prior to 9-11, and
that his excuses for it were just that. However, Welch walks right up
to the edge of claiming that believing war lies is acceptable because
people are pathetic babies. He then denounces the war lies. He then
proclaims his belief in them.
“With
remarkable ease,” Welch writes, “America’s cause went from
eliminating weapons of mass destruction to evicting an evil dictator
to spreading democracy, because the idea that our leaders might have
been wrong, incompetent, or worse was simply too disconcerting a
proposition for many Americans to consider.” Welch cannot even
write the obvious and well-documented fact that “our leaders”
were lying. He never mentions that Hillary Clinton promoted the
weapons-of-mass-destruction lies. Welch goes on to make clear that he
actually believes the evicting an evil dictator lie and describes the
war as “America’s attempt to liberate Iraq from a ruthless
dictator who had killed tens of thousands of Kurds.” He also
believes the spreading-democracy lie but blames the Bush
Administration for failing to realize that there was “no historical
basis” for democracy among the primitives being bombed in Iraq.
Welch even believes in the whole mission and denounces the outing of
Valerie Plame as putting at risk “our efforts in the war on
terror.” Whose what?
This
is typical Democratic partisanship. You denounce an unpopular war
while supporting it. You claim the loyalty of anti-Republicans, then
hopelessly try to win the votes of Republicans, while alienating
independent, thinking people. Welch even admits that Al Gore’s top
advisor and speech writer on his presidential campaign was eager for
war on Iraq and believed Gore was too, but praises Gore as radically
different from Bush because he deleted a line threatening war on Iraq
from a speech.
John
Kerry throughout the book is repeatedly “a decorated war hero”
much like Gore who becomes “a foreign-policy expert” and “one
of the most respected experts on defense matters in the history of
the United States Senate” who “served [defensively??!] in
Vietnam.”
For
Welch, war is not illegal or immoral, but a nation should analyze its
emotions prior to launching a war, and should make proper emotional
use of its enemies: “[O]ur enemies actually help us maintain a
cohesive sense of reality.” Is he referring to foreign enemies or
Republicans? This book suggests both. Welch refers without any
attempt at evidence to “Russia’s involvement in the 2016
election” and claims “We actually appointed a Russian operative
to be our National Security Advisor.” He laments energy invested in
opposing documented outrages by Trump which he thinks should go into
“the possibility that Russia is gaining control of our executive
branch of government.” The line between the Russian enemy and the
Republican enemy is blurred, and the blame for Post Hillary Stress
Disorder is dispersed.
Welch
diagnoses in “the American mind” paranoia, sexual perplexity, and
envy. The first he believes has been created by exploitation of 911,
the big real fact, while the other two have been created out of whole
cloth. And the combination serves, he thinks, to explain hatred of
Hillary Clinton. But all three, as far as I can tell, are generated
by a wide variety of lies, while there is no such thing as “whole
cloth.”
Welch’s
understanding of envy seems to especially lack understanding: “What
could Americans be envious of? Despite our national pockets of
poverty, most Americans participate heavily in a vast consumer
economy their parents never imagined.” Let’s set this comment
against reality for a moment. For many in the United States life is
harder than it was for their parents. It’s also harder than for
many around them. Poverty and economic insecurity are extremely
widespread. The United States has the highest inequality and the
highest poverty of any wealthy country. This almost certainly
contributes to envy of wealthier U.S. citizens and, to a far lesser
extent, envy of people in other nations — while contributing to a
passionate patriotism that is stronger among
the poor than the wealthy, perhaps in part because it covers up envy
of more equal and prosperous places. Welch goes on to rightly
criticize advertising for promoting envy, but the notion that it
promotes it out of nowhere is a notion shared by the right wing of
U.S. politics.
In
Welch’s view, Trump exploited women’s envy of Hillary to get them
to vote against Hillary, while men hated her out of pity for
themselves and their need to look down on all women. This is
certainly a plausible part of an explanation for the attitudes of
some people, mostly people who were probably planning to vote for
whoever was the most racist, patriotic, and plutocratic regardless of
any specifics. And Welch himself promotes the attitudes he criticizes
through the usual hypocrisies, such as mocking George W. Bush for
having been a cheerleader. But the
paranoid-sexually-insecure-envious-hateful-people-did-it does little
better than the Putin-did-it explanation of Hillary Defeat Trauma. I
would recommend, instead, the following healing steps:
Stop
identifying with a corrupt government or any portion of it. Work to
improve it, but don’t consider that work self-improvement.
Stop
imagining that social change comes primarily through elections.
Stop
identifying with a political party and with a population that makes
up 4% of the species you should identify with.
Recognize
that an extremely broken and corrupt election system allowed Trump to
“win” despite his having lost. Fix these problems before worrying
about nefarious Russian masterminds or bitter insecure racists: the
Electoral College, voter ID laws, the lack of verifiable hand-counted
paper ballots, the Presidential Debates Commission, the corporate
media, the rigged Democratic Party primaries that deprived that party
of its strongest candidate according to numerous polls, the racist
stripping of names from voter rolls in various states, the open
criminal intimidation and incitement of violence by Trump, the
disenfranchisement of people convicted of crimes, the ridiculous lack
of automatic voter registration and of an election holiday and of
sufficient polling places.
Recognize
that Hillary Clinton was one of the few candidates awful enough to
have come anywhere close to shocking Donald Trump by losing to him.
She was the epitome of financial corruption and the lack of any
consistent belief or integrity. She lost a couple of swing states,
studies suggest, to the understandable belief among military families
that she was the most likely to get their loved ones killed. She
turned off all kinds of constituencies by appearing to give a damn
exclusively about herself.
Face
head on the apparently somehow frightening perplexity that is somehow
supposed to arise in your poor little brain from the fact that lots
of people also disliked Hillary Clinton because they were sexists or
racists or other despicable things, and from the fact that this fact
doesn’t somehow erase all the facts listed above.
Post
Hillary Stress Disorder
NOW THAT THE TRUMPMEISTER HAS RECLAIMED AMERICA, THE IDIOT DEMOCRATS WANT TO GO IT ALONE AS IF THEY HAD ANY NEW IDEAS TO MOVE THE COUNTRY FORWARD! NANCY PELOSI IS ONE HEARTBEAT AWAY FROM A MASSIVE STROKE AS CAN BE SEEN IN NUMEROUS APPEARANCES IN THE LAST YEAR WHERE HER BRAIN FREEZES, SHE CANNOT FORM A COHERENT THOUGHT, SHE SLURS HER WORDS AND HAS TO BE STOPPED FROM SPEAKING BY HER AIDS BECAUSE THEY FEAR THAT SHE IS HAVING A HEALTH CRISIS. HER FATHER WAS THE MAYOR OF THAT ONCE GREAT CITY, BALTIMORE, MARYLAND. NOW IT IS A CRUMBLING, CRIME INFESTED MURDER CAPITAL, INFESTATED BY MOSTLY NIGGERS ON THE PUBLIC DOLE AND THE BLACK CRIMINAL UNDERCLASS.
NOWHERE IN THE CITY IS SAFE FOR PEOPLE TO WALK DAY OR NIGHT FOR FEAR OF BEING A VICTIM OF SOME TYPE OF CRIME. WHO RUNS THAT CITY? DEMOCRATS. THEY HAVE TAXED THE EARNERS OUT OF THE CITY AND DESTROYED THEIR TAX BASE. WHAT IS LEFT IS A SHELL F A CITY THAT HAS NOW BEEN OVERTAKEN BY RATS, COCKROACHES AND CRIME. THIS IS WHAT THE DEMOCRATS HAVE DONE TO BALTIMORE AND WILL DO TO AMERICA IF GIVEN THE CHANCE BY IMPLEMENTING THEIR "PROGRAMS"!
HERE IS AN INTERVIEW WITH KEVIN SHIPP, AUTHOR OF THE BOOK, "FROM THE COMPANY OF SHADOWS". REMEMBER NOW, JOHN O. BRENNAN WHO IS ONE OF TRUMPY'S BIGGEST CRITICS HAS LOST HIS SECURITY CLEARANCE. WHY? BECAUSE HE POSES ONE OF THE GRAVEST DANGERS TO NATIONAL SECURITY BECAUSE OF HIS PAST POSITIONS AS DIRECTOR OF CIA AND NATIONAL SECURITY ADVISER AND IS CONSIDERED A "LOOSE CANNON" WHO WOULD BETRAY HIS COUNTRY AND FELLOW AMERICANS FOR PARTISAN REASONS AND HIS MORALLY VAPID BELIEF SYSTEM OF MORAL RELATIVISM AS A WAY TO EXCUSE AWAY ANY BEHAVIOR HE SEES FIT INCLUDING THE USE OF ASSASSINATIONS, TORTURE AND NUCLEAR HOLOCAUST AGAINST ANY ENEMY REAL OR PERCEIVED, NO MATTER WHAT THE "BLOWBACK"! BOTTOM LINE, THE GUY IS A NUT!
BOTTOM LINE WILL BE THAT THESE DEEP STATE TRAITORS WILL HAVE TO PAY THE PIPER FOR THE UNFETTERED MONKEYSHINES THAT THEY HAVE ENGAGED IN. NOW THEY WILL BE REIGNED IN AND BROUGHT BACK UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE RULE OF LAW. THEIR 007 "LICENSE TO KILL" HAS BEEN REVOKED, AND THEY CAN GO BACK TO THEIR HOMETOWNS AND REGALE THE LOCAL YOKELS OF TALES OF COCAINE SMUGGLING, AND ALL THEIR OTHER TALL TALES WHILE THEY WORKED AT THE BEHEST OF THEIR GOVERNMENT AGENCIES OR CONTRACTORS. MEANWHILE, THE REST OF AMERICANS ARE TIRED OF HEARING THEM BELLYACHE AND COMPLAIN AND WANT TO GO ABOUT THEIR LIVES UNFETTERED BY AN INTRUSIVE GOVERNMENT THAT WANTS TO INTERFERE WITH EVERY ASPECT OF THEIR WAKING LIVES!
LONG LIVE GOD EMPEROR TRUMP!
No comments:
Post a Comment