Thursday, June 13, 2013

Mother Of 14 Year Old Autistic Monster Kills Own Son To Keep Him From Spending Rest Of Life In State Mental Hospital


UNABLE TO COPE WITH THE DEMANDS OF CARING FOR THIS 200 HUNDRED POUND AUTISTIC MONSTER WITH AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR, THE MOTHER DRUGGED THE LAD. WHEN THE OVERDOSE DIDN'T WORK SHE SLIT HIS WRISTS AND STABBED HIM IN HIS HEART. ONCE HE WAS DEAD, SHE AND HER CO-CONSPIRATOR ATTEMPTED SUICIDE BUT FAILED.

SHOULDN'T THE STATE HAVE GIVEN THE MOTHER THE OPTION TO EUTHANIZE THIS POOR LAD INSTEAD OF HAVING HIS ONLY OPTION BEING LIFE IN A STATE MENTAL INSTITUTION? IN MY OPINION, SHE DID THE RIGHT THING BY TERMINATING THIS KIDS LIFE. IT'S TOO BAD, SHE AND HER COHORT WERE UNSUCCESSFUL AT TERMINATING THEIR OWN LIVES. NOW THEY FACE SPENDING THE REST OF THEIR LIVES LOCKED UP IN PRISON ALL BECAUSE HER SON HAD A GENETIC DEFECT!

IT IS TIME TO CLEAR OUT THE STATE HOSPITALS OF THE IDIOTS, THE UNWELL, THOSE ON LIFE SUPPORT AND THE SEVERELY MENTALLY RETARDED AND EUTHANIZE THESE PATHETIC PIECES OF HUMANITY. NOT ONLY WILL THIS SAVE THE STATE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS CARING FOR THESE PIECES OF HUMAN FLOTSAM AND JETSAM, BUT THE MONEY SAVED COULD BE USED TO BUILD, SAY, MORE NUCLEAR WEAPONS! 

 

3 comments:

  1. IT IS TIME TO CLEAR OUT THE STATE HOSPITALS OF THE IDIOTS, THE UNWELL, THOSE ON LIFE SUPPORT AND THE SEVERELY MENTALLY RETARDED AND EUTHANIZE THESE PATHETIC PIECES OF HUMANITY.

    I wholeheartedly agree...let's begin with you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Sorry this upsets you. Faced with a lifetime in a state mental institution, the mother chose to end her sons life. She was willing to take her own life in the process. Why warehouse these people at great expense when we could just terminate their pathetic lives and free up those resources? What's the point of keeping someone who is brain dead on life support for 30 years because it is medically possible? Who pays? Why keep grandpa who had a major stroke 10 years ago alive? What's the point? Just because it's medically possible doesn't mean it's right to do so. Who pays? The State? If you have millions and want to squander it on keeping a relative alive on life support, that's your business. For the rest, pull the plug, let them die and be at peace. Keeping them alive because it is medically possible when 100 years ago the technology did not even exist is bad medicine and bad policy.

      Delete
  2. Common sense Euthanasia laws could have addressed this issue. This poor lads mother should have been allowed to let him die.

    ReplyDelete